alex - 11 August 2008 07:09 AM
Can we replace milk with calcium tablets?
I think the over-all thought that is missing here is that calcium needs a balance with other things in order to be useful. If you only drank milk, that's also not an answer. Just like you can't only eat chard or only take raw almonds to cure all. Calcium needs magnesium, boron, D and vitamin C (and some others, it varies depending on who you are reading up on) in order to be utilized by the body. Most of your magnesium is stored IN your bones. Ironically, to get the calcium, the body bleeds the mag out of your bones (hopefully you are supplementing it so that it doesn't rob your "stores" of mag) to get the calcium in there. The issue, and I read this in the Better Nutrition mag by Dr. Nan Fuschs (I think I got her name right) said that if you look at black board chalk, that is calcium gluconate...it's brittle. You drop it, it shatters. Ivory is heavy in magnesium, if you dropped a tusk or a horn, it would bounce. Same with our bones...when they are made of mag and cal, they are more resilient, when they are robbed of the mag and deposited with calcium, they are brittle. I would think that the test on those teenagers who showed improvement and then decline would be interesting...interesting to see when their mag stores were depleted...and they started to LOSE bone density, even while still taking their calcium. Oddly enough, I race horses and the most common and cheapest hay is Alfalfa, which is high in Calcium...Seeing various breakdowns in racing horses, it has lead me on some wild research and lo'and'behold, I find the whole catagory as it applies to human bodies too.

I had a horse riding friend who was started on heavy Calcium dosages, due to osteoperosis "running" in her family. She was start early, at 28 yrs old. By the time she was 35, she had such brittle bones, she coughed too hard (not kidding) and snapped a rib. She sold all her horses and only recently, came in touch with magnesium and has seen a "miraculous" increase in her bone density. Should we be surprised at our ignorance or that the solution was simple?